‘Mystery of the ‘Door to No. 1’ – How the New York Times covered the lottery with an unverified headline
Posters for the New Orleans-based Times-Picayune are not allowed to use the word lottery in print or online, but the newspaper’s editor-in-chief has been quick to defend the decision to publish a headline that could have easily been misconstrued as such.
“We have the right to publish stories, but if the headline is false, then we’re going to publish something that’s completely untrue,” said John R. MacManus, the Times’ editor in chief.
He pointed to a December column by the paper’s senior writer, Mark Fischetti, that described the lottery as “a great opportunity for us to share the story of New Orleans, of our city, our history, of the people of New York.”
In a blog post on Dec. 3, Fischett wrote that the paper was “deeply saddened” by the “incredible success” of the New England lottery and its “inspiring legacy.”
But the Times is not the only newspaper to run the headline incorrectly.
Earlier this month, the paper published a story about the city’s efforts to get a new hotel built, despite the fact that it had received “nearly $20 million in state funding” for its $20-million project.
The story claimed that “the city’s $10 billion proposal is about to come up for a vote and it’s expected to be approved by the city council,” but the story was quickly removed after The Times corrected its wording.
The Times, however, appears to have been aware of the error and continued to run its headline with it.
“The Times-picayune has a long tradition of publishing stories that are correct, but are often misconstrued by the public,” MacManUS said in a statement.
“Our goal is to provide accurate and balanced coverage of our community and its issues.
If we publish a misleading headline, we’re likely to publish another inaccurate article.”
The Times has been using an incorrect headline for years, MacManUs said, but “we have always maintained that we would be happy to fix the headline and correct the story if we are able to do so without negatively affecting the overall reputation of the paper.”
The correction comes as New York City prepares to celebrate the opening of the new New York Museum of Art on Monday.
It is expected to attract more than 2.5 million visitors in a ceremony that will be attended by more than 20 celebrities and politicians.
The new museum is also expected to become the largest museum in the U.S. in terms of number of visitors.
But MacManuses comments do not come as a surprise to people who have followed the Times story for years.
“I remember when the Times used to be a paper called The News, and then I went to the Times in the 1980s,” said Jim Gee, an associate professor at the University of Maryland who has written about the New Times.
“It was like the Times was just a newspaper with a big logo, and they didn’t make any sense.
I was a kid, and that was it.”
“I was always interested in the newspaper.
I wanted to read the paper, and I was fascinated by the history, the culture and the history of New England,” said Gee.
The New York Observer, which has published articles by MacManusky and others on the paper since the 1960s, ran a story on Dec.
“1 in which it quoted the Times about its lottery coverage.
The paper quoted Fischezz’s column as saying the Times-poster headline “is a very accurate portrayal of the lottery.”
The New Orleans Times-Democrat has also used the incorrect headline since 2007.
Macmanus said that he was not aware of any other newspaper that ran the headline with the word “lotto” in it.
“There’s no justification for it. “
That headline is so offensive, so offensive to the public, that I can’t see how it would be allowed,” said Paul O’Byrne, who teaches journalism at the City University of New London.
“There’s no justification for it.
There’s no excuse for it.”
The fact that the Times had to correct the headline itself does not seem to matter to some readers, however.
“This is the kind of headline that’s been running in the paper for a long time,” said Joe Pugh, a journalism professor at Northeastern University who has taught about the newspaper for more than 40 years.
Pugh noted that the headline “lots of times” could be translated as “millions of people get lottery tickets” or “loyalty cards” or other similar words.
“In a newspaper, that would not be acceptable,” Pugh said. “But in