Worst of the Worst ( 4:55) A couple of days ago, the Washington Post posted a poster board for a campaign to stop Donald Trump from becoming president. This poster board is a reference to a recent
in the Wall Street Journal (washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/2016/03/11/post-election-poll-shows-trump-leads-most-popular-presidential-voters) about how Hillary Clinton lost to Trump in November.
The poster board reads: “We need a new type of government.
It is not going to happen again in the United States of America.
We must elect a new president who is truly independent and will stand up to the Washington elites.
We must elect the president who fights for all of us.
The Republican party is a party of insiders and it is time to elect the candidate who will fight for all Americans.
There is no better choice for the Republican Party than Donald Trump.
He has been a true champion for all those struggling in our country.
I want to thank you for taking the time to read this.
I look forward to seeing you in November.”
The poster has been taken down, but the WSJ article remains on the website.
The article was a response to the fact that Trump’s poll numbers in November were not as strong as the ones from earlier this year.
It was published by the WSJs’ polling company.
The WSJ said in an interview with CNN’s Anderson Cooper that its pollsters and pundits who are not members of the Republican party are worried about how this poster board could be interpreted by some in the Republican base.
The WSJs poll showed Trump was the most popular presidential candidate with 38% of the vote in November, followed by former Florida Governor Jeb Bush with 19%, former New York Governor John Kasich at 10%, former Pennsylvania Senator Rick Santorum at 8%, former Senator Rick Scott of South Carolina at 6%, former Governor Mitt Romney at 4%, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich at 3%, former Vice President Joe Biden at 2%, former Arizona Governor Jan Brewer at 1%, former U.S. Representative Mike Pence at 1% and former New Jersey Governor Chris Christie at 1%.
In a statement, the WSj said, “In an election where the stakes are so high and the stakes so high for the future of our democracy, we feel it is important to make sure we do not interpret this poster as an attack on the Republican nominee.
In fact, we are proud to say that our staff has covered the most important and controversial events in American history, from the 9/11 attacks to the Arab Spring to the Ebola pandemic.””
As a news organization, we take great pride in providing the most accurate and up-to-date coverage of the news.
In fact, we are proud to say that our staff has covered the most important and controversial events in American history, from the 9/11 attacks to the Arab Spring to the Ebola pandemic.”
The WSJ did not immediately respond to a request for comment from The Daily Beast.